Opened this <issue> regarding changing the docs to...
# dev
y
Opened this issue regarding changing the docs to exclude the wildcard DNS record from our basic documentation instructions, to reduce friction and simplify deployment. Question to everyone: for this to work, the user will have to force path-style access, at least in some AWS clients. Considering that 2 DNS records still need to be created, and that the s3_gatway_domain parameter still needs to be specified for lakeFS, how much simpler does it actually make things?
g
On my opinion, given that we still use the S3 DNS record (
<http://s3.lakefs.example.com|s3.lakefs.example.com>
) it doesn’t make it simple. Once we do find a solution for the S3 endpoint as well (however we decide to do it), it will make sense.
👍 2
👍🏻 1
a
Imo it is simpler. Some DNSes don't allow you to set up wildcard entries at all. E.g. Docker. In other cases users will have a hard time setting up the wildcard entry. It's a speed bump when getting started, I want not to have it.