This message was deleted.
# dev
s
This message was deleted.
e
Very cool!
o
Clever! how would you estimate this in terms of engineering effort?
a
SORRY! Deleted the wrong response.
Original: I've just opened this proposal to improve performance of concurrent merges by performing them in parallel (will happen anyway in KV... which just makes this proposal save more time!) and reusing their "failed" metaranges. It is kind-of an analogue to the lock-free improvement for concurrent commits. I expect it to be quite effective. 🙂 Very interested in your comments (especially if they being "there is no way this could ever work"...)!