What does `lakectl local` consider to be a "change...
# help
a
What does
lakectl local
consider to be a "change"? It appears that running
touch
on a file tracked by it, so that only the modification time changes, is sufficient to have it show up in
lakectl local status
as a change, and then get re-pushed in it's entirety when
lakectl local commit
is run. Is there a way to avoid this so that only changes to file contents cause a diff in a commit?
lakefs 1
o
Hi @Aaron Taylor Please refer to https://github.com/treeverse/lakeFS/issues/8113. Please feel free to comment there
👍 2
a
Thanks, I left a comment! I see it's a recent issue, but any insights you can share into where it and
lakectl local
improvements generally fit in the current lakefs roadmap?
o
It is indeed a recent issue raised last week on the same subject. As it seems like an issue that affects many users, it will probably be prioritized in the coming weeks.
a
Great to hear, thank you!
👍 2